![mac parallels vs vmware mac parallels vs vmware](https://mac-optimization.bestreviews.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/parallels-desktop-shared-profile-options.png)
- #Mac parallels vs vmware software#
- #Mac parallels vs vmware windows 8#
- #Mac parallels vs vmware windows 7#
- #Mac parallels vs vmware windows#
On Windows 7, Parallels in both DirectX configurations enjoys a slight performance lead over Fusion.
#Mac parallels vs vmware windows 8#
We also tested Windows 8 performance in both applications, as is noted in the graphs below.įuturemark’s PCMark benchmark attempts to evaluate overall system performance, and includes tests for computational tasks, image and video playback and manipulation, web browsing, gaming, and storage speed. Unsure as to exactly how Parallels was implementing DirectX 10, and curious about whether its implementation would cause performance variations outside of applications that called for DirectX 10, we ran separate tests for Parallels in both DirectX 9 and 10 configurations. Parallels 8 provides “experimental” support for DirectX 10, Microsoft’s set of multimedia APIs, while Fusion only supports up to DirectX 9. Some tests were not possible in certain configurations, and those are noted below. This was to ensure that there would be plenty of space for all the virtual machines, as well as to eliminate any potential drive or interface bottlenecks.Įxcept where otherwise noted, all tests were performed three times, and the results, as long as they were within 5 percent of each other, were averaged. The virtual machines were all stored on an external Pegasus R4 Thunderbolt RAID array with four 3 TB mechanical hard drives in a RAID 5 configuration. The configuration options don’t completely translate between applications, but each was set up to maximize the performance of the virtual machine over that of the host OS.
#Mac parallels vs vmware windows 7#
We compared Parallels Desktop 8.0.181 with Fusion 5.0.1 and measured their ability to run the 64-bit versions of Windows 7 Professional and Windows 8 Pro.īoth virtualization applications were configured to use four of the iMac’s eight logical processors and 4 GB of RAM. Our tests were performed on a 2011 27-inch iMac at 3.4 GHz with 16 GB of RAM running OS X 10.8.1. If there is high demand for benchmarking other configurations, please let us know and we will do our best to accomodate requests.
#Mac parallels vs vmware software#
However, most Mac consumers will use the software to virtualize a recent version of Windows, so we have focused our benchmarking efforts on that configuration. Armed with the latest software from both companies, we can now take a look at how well Mac users can expect to run Windows in the coming year.īoth applications can virtualize a myriad of operating systems, including OS X, nearly all versions of Windows, and multiple Linux varieties. Just a few days later, Parallels Desktop 8, the primary competitor to Fusion in the consumer OS X virtualization market, launched. But if all you need is Windows and you want some of the featurs Parallels is brining to the table it is probably a better buy at the moment.Last week, we benchmarked VMware Fusion 5 and found that it offered a consistent performance increase over its predecessor, Fusion 4.
![mac parallels vs vmware mac parallels vs vmware](https://cdn.wethegeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Parallels-Desktop-2.jpg)
![mac parallels vs vmware mac parallels vs vmware](https://apporbit.com/wp-content/uploads/4.-You-can-easily-gain-access-to-your-VM-with-VMware-right-from-your-hosts-desktop-1024x576.jpg)
Personally I'll probably get VMWare Fusion when it's released as opposed to Parallels because VMWare has good support for multiple operating systems where as Parallels seems to focus almost exclusivly on Windows. Fusion also allows you to use two CPUs in the virtual machine and USB 2.0.īut again Fusion is a beta program at the moment so it's not going to be a stable as Parallels is at the moment (in fact I got a kernel panic while installing Windows XP) and since debugging mode and logging are still enabled in the beta Fusion is going to run slower then Parallels. The main thing I really like about their software is that there is support for a plathora of operating systems not just Windows.īut I also haven't used Parallels (I've been waiting for VMWare Fusion) so I'm not sure how good it is but I can tell you some of the things that VMWare Fusion supports that I've heard Parallels doesn't at the moment (it may in a beta version).įirst of all Fusion supports a huge number of operating systems includeing several flavors of Linux (I just installed Ubuntu and it works great), Windows of course (everything from 3.11 to experimental support for Vista), Solaris, MS-DOS, and even a few more. Personally I really like VMWare's tools, they do nice work and produce some really quality products. I use VMWare at work almost every day and I just downloaded the beta of VMWare Fusion for OS X.